The purpose of this web page is to keep a public journal of the table-top games I play this year.
I played a couple games of Robo Rally last night (two player and three player on a two board map) and it turned out to be much more fun than reviews implied. I guess one should play with analytically and logically minded people to speed things along. Two-player was an hour. Three was two hours. I wonder if it keeps scaling that way. I play Robo Rally with house rules that make it more fun.
I went to a store in Waltham, Danger Planet, which has open gaming. I got to meet other gamers and played Risk 2210 which is Risk with interesting twists. This is the second time I played Risk and I find I still hate it because no matter what strategy and tactics I use, the die roll still decides whether I win or lose. Also played Hell Rail which is a tile laying game with trains that pick up and drop off damned souls. Could be interesting, but the game's graphic design is not engaging and the rules and mechanics seem a bit convoluted for a first-time player.
Thursday's gaming night at the gaming store ( Danger Planet) we played 7 player Top Secret Spies, 5 player Robo Rally, and 4 player Guillotine.
I don't know if Top Secret Spies can be fun. In it, you move spies around the board scoring points, but no one knows which spies belong to which of the other players. There are three levels of the game. First is as simple as I just described. Second adds cards to mess with positions of spies. Third adds scoring based on guesses of who's playing which spies (but we didn't get to that level... the second level of the game dragged out the length of the game to the point that it was no fun and we halved the scoring requirement to end it sooner.) As I can see it, if you move your own spy to advantage, you'll get a high score and people will know it's you. Otherwise, you'd be advancing someone else to keep them from guessing who you are, and you'll get the lower score. Knowing who's who never really matters during the game because everyone will try to knock down whoever is ahead. I think this game would be more fun for kids.
Robo Rally is a game where you pre-program robots to race on a factory floor with obstacles and the fun happens when robots knock each other of course. Our game went surprisingly fast because I do a good job of setting up the boards, but it didn't have enough interaction. I created an L-shaped design with two checkpoints but used a board that let players skirt the edge for the corner piece making it surprisingly easy for the winning player. I think it'll be better to keep a linear shape or a shape with only two boards (as I usually do) to keep interaction high. This game lasted two hours, so I'm not sure how it scales, but maybe about two hours is what a game with two or three boards with two checkpoints takes.
Guillotine is a cute card game, fun for its theme. Players are competing executioners vying to chop off the heads of the most valuable French nobles.
Played Lord of the Rings with Allen, Jeff and Nancy. With Nancy and Jeff being big fans of the books, we found the game most engaging. We were tense as we went on the journey and all these nasty things were happening which were getting us potentially and actually closer to Sauron's corruption. Sauron won this time and we scored only 51 points. (60 points means we made it to Mt. Doom, and over 60 pts means we destroyed the One Ring.)
I unwrapped the shrinkwrap on my Acquire board game Sunday and played against Nancy. (The rules were in German... arrrgh... good thing for the Internet!) She played a vicious game. I had a majority in two companies, and she kept ahead of me in all the others but one, Quantum, which we tied for. (That was a great moment because I merged a corp with Quantum and traded up to get the rest of Quantum's stock to tie with Nancy! Caught up with her before she could react! :-) The bank ran out of stock in most of the corporations! The game ended with Quantum and Hydra as the only safe corporations. I lost by $12,500. Nancy made the most of the cash from the first merger, and I couldn't catch up! Interesting that Phoenix was the one corporation that kept coming back merger after merger :-) Score was $77,100 to $64,600. [Note: The reason that a tie was possible was because the 25th share of Quantum was mixed into another stack of stock, and it didn't occur to me that there is an odd number of shares for each corporation.]
Open gaming at Danger Planet. Played 6-player Great Brain Robbery, 5-player Lord of the Rings (with Pilar, Tom, Rich), 5-player Evo (with Pilar, Tom, Rich, Jimmy.)
I played a game of Acquire with Les, with the 100-75-50-25% stock bonus house rule. Les had the good tiles and formed corporations early on, while I couldn't. I made the mistake of spending my money early and didn't have money to buy Phoenix which Les created and merged, then I ignored it buying up other stock when Les had the opportunity to create and merge Phoenix again! This set me back and I ended up majority in only one corporation, while Les was a majority in the remaining corporations. The game ended with Sackson and Hydra being safe, and the score at:
Went to Danger Planet and played 3-player Chez Geek, 3-player Atlantis: Pathways of the Deep, and 3-player Great Brain Robbery. Attendance was low because of the bad weather.
Chez Geek was a fun themed card game in which players are roommates and are trying to slack off the most, while reducing slack time of the other players. I think Steve Jackson Games makes a lot of games that are appealing if only you get into the theme and this is one of them.
Atlantis: Pathways of the Deep is a game I picked up at KB Toys for $2. Being a Hasbro game, it's a game with high quality parts at a Cheapass price. It's tile-laying game in which a player lays tiles or rotates a tile trying to create a path to Atlantis which is at the center of the 9x9 board. Then try to move their subs along the path to get to the center. It's a fun game that doesn't last long at all so it's suited as a filler game.
Cheapass Games Great Brain Robbery was fun. This time, we ended up with unaffordable brains at the beginning of the game, so the zombie players were running around brainless most of the time. Then we finally started drawing cheese when we could pay the tokens for a brain. When we finally got the engine, it was a race to draw and install a brain.
Dante and I, and Nancy and Dante, played 2-player filler games of Cheapass Games Very Clever Pipe Game It lives up to its name by being an engaging quick game about laying plumbing and collecting pipe cards that are capped at both ends in the player's color. It's novel compared to other pipe games because the tiles are rectangular, which makes for more interesting layouts, strategically and aesthetically.
Nancy and I played our first game of Java Things got off to a fast start with us building cities with bigger palaces. As the board filled up things became very interesting in that there were so many good plays each of us could make but we were limited to making only a few of the good plays and preventing a few of opponent's plays. I read on the Net about analysis-paralysis at this point in the game, but, except for a couple turns, our turns went fairly quickly-- perhaps because both of us can analyze patterns and make decent decisions quickly. The game ended surprisingly close at the final scoring at: Nancy 102, Vitas 100. We did miss the rule about opponents participating in festivals only if their developers were in the same city as the initiating player's developers. However, our scores would have been just as close if lower.
Went to a BLAH gaming session. Played 4-player Ursuppe, 3-player Settlers of Catan, 2-player Battle Line.
Ursuppe is the amoeba battle in the primordial soup. Players play amoeba's eating food bits of each of the other players' colors, leaving behind two of their own colors. They collect up mutant genes which must survive different ozone levels per turn. There's not enough of each mutant gene for all players. Movement is within an asymmetrical board containing food bits, and movement is by current or spending BP's (which is the game's form of money.) Using BP's, players can divide amoebas, obtain mutant genes, or try to alter their movement. Players can only perform specific actions during the specific phase per turn that allows it, and players take turns within each phase in the order of their scores.
There's little interaction during the game, unless you count the metagaming interaction to negotiate not getting eaten my aggressive mutant amoebas. And the game seemed slow because there's a lot of game bit swapping for each amoeba. I could see how turns would end long before my chance to move again, and I could see who'd win half-way into the game, because it seems that owning a survival of the fittest (which allows an amoeba to eat another amoeba instead of colored bits thereby severely limiting other players), movement (which gives a player more control over movement) and free action (which gives a player to control movement without paying for it) will pretty much guarantee a win. Considering there's only one of each of those cards, and not getting them means you're counting on a lot of luck to win.
Final score:
Settlers of Catan Seems like this game, the high probability numbers actually came up more often than others, which meant that all of us were often lacking in resource cards we needed and have to trade up.
I did a nasty thing to Tamara who asked me to trade to resources for one at my port, but I demanded payment to do it once I had a chance. That didn't go at all with the spirit of the game, and I felt guilty enough to offer her additional cards for free later in the game to make up for it. I only played the robber on opponent hexes to get even with them, which surprised Rich and Tamara who always play the robber to get an advantage. It was a close game until the end because of the shortage which affected all of us.
Final score:
Battle Line This seems like a combination of Solitaire and Poker. Playing a deck with six suites, players start with a hand of six cards and a battle line of nine pawns. The idea is to create a hand of three cards at each pawn that beats the opponent's hand at the same pawn. beating a hand wins the pawn. Winning three pawns in a row, or winning five pawns total wins the game. Players alternate plating a card then drawing from a draw pile or from a tactics pile. The tactics pile has special cards with special abilities. One rule that threw me is that players win a pawn before both hands at that pawn play our if they can prove from the face up cards that it can't be beat; however, the tactics cards don't count toward this proof.
Tamara won with three pawns in a row.
Click here for another take on this session.
Went to Danger Planet. Played 6-player Dog's Life, 4-player Java, 2-player Elements.
Dog's Life is a theme heavy, strategy lite game. Players play dogs doing dog-ly things: eating, fetching bones, piddling, avoiding the dog catcher. This is done on a board representing a neighborhood. (It's a closed loop, so it must be Pleasantville. :-) With that many people, there's a lot of down-time between plays, which made for more time to socialize, which is good because the game itself requires little thought.
Rob, Tony, Ian and I played a game of Java This games works well with four players as it does with two. Every turn is very engaging, thinking about all the possible moves, and the juicy ones you have to give up as well. Even during the downtime, you can spend time thinking about the moves. It's a beautiful board with many possibilities, so it's a pleasure to examine the board while thinking about the next move.
Seems like with this many people, it's better to kick off final scoring as soon as possible, otherwise everyone gets a chance to minimize the score of the last person to play.
Started to clear the board before I recorded the score, so they're approximate.
Elements. This is a game prototype designed by Ian. It's a battling mage game, casting spells with energy from the elements. There is 4x4 square board on which the available elements are placed face up, and elements are flipped as they are used. The center elements are flipped up before each turn. Any available spells may be cast during each turn. Spells are chosen ala Robo Rally... three spells are chosen to cast in an order, and revealed simultaneously. Spells affect hit points of each mage, or affect the elements on the board. There are spells that cause a lasting effect on the opponent or remove the lasting effect on self. There are no healing spells, but there are shield spells.
Played Cheapass Games Very Clever Pipe Game with Nancy. The first game, we played conservatively, and I was able to snatch up more pipe than Nancy. Next game, I tried to make the longest pipe possible before scoring, playing clever moves with every forking pipe she lay. However, Nancy was able to capyure a small bit of pipe, opening my pipe up in a way that I couldn't play my master stroke connecting three pipelines at once... darn! Third game I played for the fun of seeing how long I could make pipes before having to cap them. But, I didn't get the good cards to keep going like last time, so I lost it too.
Final scores:
As an aside, someone looked pleadingly toward me as I walked by a group playing Top Secret Spies. "Save me," he said. Apparently playing the full version with the cards. I had visions of the movie Aliens in which captured marines begged "kill me" rather than face the horror of birthing an alien bursting out of their chests.
Nancy and I went to dinner and she told me she liked The Very Clever Tile Game most of all the games I introduced her to. (Go being her most favorite. Though, I enjoy the game she designed which is based on the Penrose pattern.) Well, I happen to carry it around because it's one of the few fun games that fits in my jacket pocket, so I carry it around for just such a gaming fix! :-)
Well, I get so greedy in this game. I love the way pipes sprawl out and the temptation to try to extend the pipes by just one more instead of capping them was too much for me, and I payed for it. But, what can I say? A good game is fun, even when I'm losing, and this is one of those games.
Went to Danger Planet and played 4-player Java, 6-player Family Business, and 6-player Kill Dr. Lucky. (I'm going to add game times so it'll be easy to see what real-world play times are like.)
Java. It was Tony, Cindy, Rob and me, with Cindy playing for the first time. You could tell Cindy was seriously thinking about all her moves, which earned her second place. This time, we took over all the reservoirs early on, going for the quickie points. Even Tony, who held back to build palaces, eventually couldn't resist the draw of water. Rob was ahead until final scoring. Tony kicked it off, leaving Rob to be last during final scoring round, which significantly crippled him. The game lasted about 1.5 hours, excluding about 15 minutes to explain all the rules to the newbie.
Family Business. It was me, Rob, Tony, Jason, Adam and Cindy playing this game, with most of us playing for the first time. It reminded us of Guillotine, in that we had to put other players' mobsters against the wall and start killing them when there were over five there. It's a game in which you'd have to get into the theme. Adam certainly did because he picked out specific mobsters to put against the wall, even though they all scored the same. Cindy was giggled maniacally when she singled one of us out. Tony and Rob liked to voice out gangsters. We developed such quirks in this game. Players select mobsters to put against the wall via action cards, and there's a chance to counter the action. If a counter is played, that player takes the next turn, otherwise play continues clockwise. After about 45 minutes, Tony won.
Kill Dr. Lucky. It was me Andy, Adam, Karl, Rich and Matt playing this game. All of us, I think, played it for the first time. It's a fun game if you get into the theme. People figured out how to stay ahead of Dr. Lucky around the mansion in order to get to be alone with him to knock him off. (When Dr. Lucky enters the room with a player, that player gets the next turn, otherwise play continues clockwise. Strange that Family Business had a similar mechanic as well.) After about an hour, Andy attempted to kill Dr. Lucky and we all ran out of cards to prevent him.
I visited a best friend, Paul, in Poughkeepsie, for a weekend of gaming fun. Paul is amazing... He "gets" games at the first go and beat me at every new board game we played. Played 2-player Before I Kill You, Mr. Bond..., 2-player Acquire, 3-player Settlers of Catan, 2-player Star Wars: The Queen's Gambit, 2-player Java.
Paul and I played Before I Kill You, Mr. Bond... (Better Edition) until we ran out of cards, instead of until someone reaches 33 points. This was the first time either of us played it. I picked up this game because Paul and I often talk about how stupid villains are in movies, not killing their opponents right away. This was fun for its theme, but the strategy is obvious: when you capture a spy, play taunts that have been played or when matching taunts are in your hand. Otherwise, kill the spy right away. We played three games. Each game was about 20 minutes.
Scores for three games:
Paul and I played Acquire, with a 100-50-25% variant for merging payoffs. We both played this before. I mirrored Paul early on in the game which kept us even at the start. Things started to diverge and I was holding out hoping to grow some corporations before merging them, but Paul created a merge that ended the game with a 41 tile corporation. This game lasted about an hour and a half.
Paul, his wife Jennifer, and I played Settlers of Catan. All of us played this before. Jennifer likes this game because the element of chance means she has a chance at winning against her husband. However, she and I didn't have good luck obtaining resources, while Paul had more than enough. He even held back winning, but eventually got bored and won just to end the game. Hah! This game lasted about two hours.
My favorite board game session was Avalon Hill's Star Wars The Queen's Gambit. This was the first time either of us played it. It recreates the final four concurrent battles at the end of the movie. Paul played Naboo and I played the Federation. I lost Darth Maul early on. But I was overwhelming the Naboo forces planetside. It was the palace that where the real battle was. But once Obi-wan started unleashing his Jedi greatness on the droids, it was a simple matter for the palace guards to block droid reenforcements from entering while Anakin took out the droid control ship.
Actually, I said it was a simple matter, but that's in hindsight. The first time we played through, it wasn't obvious what the outcome would be. Paul didn't think of gumming up the staging area with palace guards, so that droids couldn't get into the palace, until later in the game. I tried taking advantage of that, but I didn't get enough cards to deploy droids and move them into the palace fast enough.
In the end, Naboo won. We actually ended the game before the proper victory condition of Anakin reaching the droid control ship because Naboo blocked off the staging area and cleared the palace of Federation forces. At this point, it was inevitable that Anakin will reach the droid control ship with the Federation unable to achieve its victory condition of wiping out all Naboo forces.
The random element could have swayed the game either way early on. It was a lot of fun and tense to the end. It took us two hours to set up all the pieces for the first time and read through the rules. It took us about four hours to play through. Hopefully, this long time was because it was our first time, having to place stickers and separate cards, and read rules, and refer to the reference cards. Postings on the Net say it's about a two-hour game.
Paul and I played Java. This was the first time Paul played it. I caught a rule I missed earlier in the game but let it pass, that a highest ranking developer adjacent to a reservoir scores on it. This is why Paul won... yea, that's it. We were very aggressive scoring reservoirs early on. Anyways, Paul was ahead when I initiated final scoring. There, I shot past him on my turn. Paul, being the calculating sort, actually checked his final score before playing his turn. He found he'd lose by one point, so all he did was raise his rank at one city during his turn and ended up winning. This game lasted about two hours.
How many things can go wrong? This was a session with friends at my place. Played 4-player Settlers of Catan, 3-player Bausack.
Settlers of Catan. This was the first time Maggie, Mike and Teresa have played this game. Maggie was afraid of the game after Dante told her about it, but in the end, it wasn't that bad. No resource problems here. In fact, the game was going swimmingly, with myself, Mike, Teresa and Maggie. Then Mike bowed out in the middle of the game. Dante came back from work, so he took over for Mike. Teresa had to go because it was getting late, so we decided to end the game after an hour. We didn't roll 7's until towards the end, and by then, many of us had over seven cards.
Dante, Maggie and I then tried three games of Bausack with the Bandu rules I remember playing many years ago. The first two games, Maggie wasn't into it and and her tower collapsed after three pieces. Dante was trying unreasonable stack and collapsed after three pieces as well. A hollow victory for me each time.
The third game became interesting because Dante had a tall, narrow tower built up. He was taking oddly-shaped pieces from me and adding pieces himself. I found his tower fascinating. My own tower had a wider base and could stack more without being as challenging. (Maggie's tower collapsed early in the game, so she watched in fascination as well, helping Dante out.) The game ended abruptly with an accidental jar to the table. sigh.
Went to Your Move Games for their Looney Games night. Played 6-player Zendo, 5-player Thin Ice, 5-player Volcano, 5&6-player Chrononauts.
Zendo is a fun puzzle game in which one player who is the mediator ("Master") sets up Icehouse pieces ("koans") two different ways. One koan is an example of a set-up that has "Buddha nature" and the other koan doesn't. During each turn, each player creates his own koan and either asks Master if the koan has Buddha nature or asks for "Mondo," which is a round in which all players guess whether the koan has Buddha nature or not. Those who guess correctly, get a "guessing stone." Guessing stones are used by a player to guess what the properties are of a koan with Buddha nature. If a player guesses correctly, he wins. Otherwise, Master sets up a counter-example koan himself that has the properties the player specified, but is a contrary to the properties of a koan with Buddha nature. Played two quick games of this.
Thin Ice is a tower building game using Icehouse pieces. Each player has a set of pieces in one color. Each player in turn says which one or two pieces should be added next to the tower. No more than three pieces can touch the table, no more than two can be held in your hand, and tips of pieces may not touch. We played two quick games of this.
Volcano is a puzzle game that uses Icehouse pieces that required some thought. Pieces are set up on a grid, and some are capped with black pieces. Moving a black piece causes the pieces that were underneath to jump over to the successive pieces. Matching sizes are removed and kept for scoring. A point is scored for each piece kept, 5 points for each set of three different sizes making a "tree," 7 points if those pieces are the same color. This game took a while and took some intense concentration, but at some turns there were no advantageous moves.
Chrononauts is a card came in which players are time travellers who manipulate a timeline by inverting Linchpin events which causes a ripple of changes, then patching the resulting paradoxes. We played with the Lost Identities expansion which adds ID cards and mission cards. Each player has to achieve one of three goals: patching specific dates on the timeline which will bring the time traveller back to his own timeline, retrieving three artifacts, or holding ten cards in his hand. Thirteen paradoxes end the game with everyone losing. This is an interesting strategy game, but is strongly themed so part of the fun is reading the cards that are played, especially the artifacts, ID cards and mission cards. We played two games, one 5-player game went fairly quickly (with me winning) and one 6-player game seemed to drag, probably because we played long enough to reshuffle the draw deck.
Gaming at Danger Planet. Played 4-player Java, 5-player Carcassonne, 5-player Kill Dr. Lucky.
Java. It was Matt, Rob, Adam and me playing Java. Matt and Adam played for the first time. We went straight for scoring reservoirs right off the bat. Matt scored a nice ten point city with all hexes in a row, which I thought was novel. Rob duplicated the effort later on. Problem with this is that it's very easy to break off new cities from this pattern! Matt was ahead during the beginning of the game, even setting himself as a really high ranking developer before anyone moved in. Festivals petered out towards the end because people didn't want to buy festival cards unless there was nothing better to do. Game ended after about an hour and a half.
Carcassonne with River Expansion. It was Matt, Cindy, Andrew, Adam and me playing Carcassonne. This was Matt's game, and Cindy and I were new players. This game is a fun tile-laying game in which you place tiles and leave behind a developer, if you so choose, to score points on either roads, palaces, citadels or farms. Farms are trickier because those developers stay on board until the end of the game, unlike the other developers which are available for reuse as soon as they score. All I know is I ended up with a lot of citadels which didn't score during the game. I had fun playing the game, though. Looking back through the rules, we played two things incorrectly. A completed palace that's only two tiles big scores two points rather than the full four we played. And partial palaces during final scoring, shields score one point and palace tiles score two, as opposed to one/one as we played. (Wouldn't have helped my score at all.) Game ended after about an hour and a half.
[Scoring for incomplete cities in Carcassonne is 1 for each tile and 1 for each shield, so you did score that part correctly. --Sean ]
Kill Dr. Lucky. It was Eric, Andrew, Rich, Karl, and me playing this. Only eventful thing this game is my debating Karl whether it helps strategically to hold back failure cards. I think it doesn't matter, because when we cycle through a deck, all failure cards either have been played or are in hand, and all you really need to do is keep track of how many failure points are left to decide how to attack Dr. Lucky. (I didn't do it yet, but I'll have to count up the failure cards before the next tournament. :-) Karl has the right idea, that we explain, using colorful prose, what we're going to do to Dr. Lucky, and how those plans are foiled when failure cards are played. This makes the game more fun and creative.
Andrew won after about 45 minutes of play.
As an aside, considering how simple the strategy is, and the game becomes a waiting game, maybe game play will go faster with the following variant.
Failure cards may be played by the attacking player to counter failure cards played by opponents. ie: Failure cards may be played to fail failure cards.
Private 5-player game of Samurai Swords (also known as Shogun.)
Samurai Swords. We had a four hour session to review and play the game. This is a dice-oriented wargame set in Feudal Japan. Players were Tony, Matt, Rob, Jeff, and myself. All of us played the game before but a long time ago. I started out with a bang, consolidating my forces on the right-most coast and left-most island. Everyone felt threatened by this and proceeded to gang up on me. Tony was spread thin by the initial setup and took time to consolidate his forces. Bad luck and my Daimyo was weakened and later destroyed. Matt felt the nasty effects of unlucky die rolls in one exchange as well. After four or five turns, it was obvious to me Jeff would kill off my remaining Daimyo with two armies and a Ninja assassin, and everyone let it happen while pursuing their own battles. We ended the game once my third Daimyo was eliminated by Jeff because it's fairly certain that he would win at that point and because we had a four hour limit to our game.
As an aside, I created a Shogun/Samurai Swords Manual that presents the rules in a logical and sequential manner, while retaining all the information from the original rules, for your review. I'd appreciate feedback on it.
Private session. Played 2-player Triangoes and 2-player Quintillions.
Triangoes.
Triangoes is a set of laser-cut acrylic tiles in the shape of
triangles. They have one color on one side and two colors on the
other. It comes with a leather-textured vinyl banner that is used
as the game board.
Triangoes, like all Kadon games, is more of a kit for geometrical puzzles. It comes with a booklet of games. We tried one, To the Point, in which we place tiles on the game board such that edges do not touch. The last person who can do that wins. We also tried another game, Match, in which we place tiles (dual-colored side up) on the game board such that edges must touch and must match in color. We played three games in about an hour.
Quintillions.
Quintillions is a set of laser-cut wooden tiles shaped in all the
twelve arrangements that five squares connected on edges could be
in. We played a game such that we alternately draw tiles, then we
alternately place the tiles in the center of the table and score a
point for each edge that touches an existing tile, then we spend
six turns each shifting tiles around scoring the same way, then we
remove tiles scoring for each edge that no longer touches the
remaining tiles. The person who goes first gets a five-point start.
We played two games for about a half-hour each.
Then the tricky thing. We actually had the Super Deluxe Quintilions which has additional shapes extending into the third dimension. (I can't wait to play a game using those!) Putting these pieces back into their rectangular shape took about another 45 minutes. :-)
Open gaming at Danger Planet. I played 6-player Elfenland, 5-player Lord of the Rings.
Elfenland.
Playing the game: Adam, Cindy, Rich, Tom, Matt, and
myself. Everyone was playing it for the first time. This game is
played on a game board which is a map of different cities connected
by roads over different types of terrain, and a few additionally by
waterways. Turn starts by drawing modes of transport, the players
place these modes on each of the roads, then cards that were
shuffled out are spent to travel using specific modes of transport.
The goal is to visit as many cities as possible within five turns.
We didn't have a good grasp on the rules because Rich just wanted
to play the game, but once we caught onto the rules, we played it
properly. Looking it up on Funagain.com, I see there's two
different rules (Amigo version and Alan Moon's version), and I
think people were familiar with one or the other which just created
more confusion and rules lookup. (I do see that this game would be
fun with more players, rather than less.) I ended up in a bad place
with the wrong set of tokens and cards. I wish I understood the
game better because the first turn, I had great cards and tokens
which I didn't take advantage of. Adam had a complete grasp on the
networking path he needed to take and won the game.
Lord of
the Rings, with the Friends
& Foes expansion.
Playing the game: Pilar, Tom,
Nancy, Mike. The expansion was new to all of us. This game was
extremely tough! We were playing with the advanced rules, which I
think is bad because it's not in the spirit of the fellowship. The
advanced rule means only one player may pay the cost to avoid
events and buy favors from Gandolf. I think the cost should be
shared unless the cost text specifically states that only the
active player or ring-bearer should pay the cost.
Anyways, Sauron overtook us in Helm's Deep. We ended with a score of 37, adding in the slain foes pushed the score to 52.
After leaving Danger Planet, Nancy and tried a few games of our own. 2-player Quintillions, 2-player Super Deluxe Quintillions, 2-player Wiz War.
Quintillions.
Not much to say here. Read the previous report about this game.
Super
Deluxe Quintillions.
Finally got to play the 3D version
of Quintillions. How fun it was to build up a tower of these
shapes. We ended the game, without the shifting and disassembly
phase because it was getting late.
Wiz
War.
Finally played this game which was a gift from
long ago. I made it a priority because it would be played at the
upcoming tournament at Danger Planet. The rules are
long, so I wanted to get a jump on them.
It turned out that it took longer to read the rules than it took to play the game. The rules are much simpler than the text lets on. The basic play is you start with 8 cards. Each turn, you draw two cards, but stop drawing if you'll end up with more than 8 cards. You get three movement points. You can play a number card to increase movement. During that time, you can pick things up and cast spells. If you cast a spell, you can add a number card with it if the card allows it. You turn ends when you run out of movement points or you give up your turn. That's it! That's all! Nothing more to see here! All those pages of rules are there to resolve questions about nit-picky details!
After a quick game, Nancy won by making off with my treasure chests, taking time to give my wizard a punch, even. Fourty minutes to read the rules and play the game, but the game was really, really short!
As an aside... Did I read it right? Someone who wrote a review on Funagain.com took 12 hours to play this game?!?!
Tournament at Danger Planet. This was a fun time because I got to try a new game and introduced other people to games I knew, and met some new people. (A Rochester NY connection, even... where I'm from! :-) I played 5-player Carcassonne, 6-player Guillotine, 4-player Settlers of Catan, 5-player Honor of the Samurai.
Additional Games played at the Tournament:
Carcassonne.
Playing this game: Rich, Eric, Deborah, Patti, and myself.
Eric, and Patti were playing for the first time. This game was very
co-operative, but limited to the luck of the draw. People had
opportunities for quick points, and for long-term scores which
either worked out or didn't by the time the tiles ran out. The game
ran for about an hour and a half.
Guillotine.
Playing this game: Nancy, Rich, Eric, Deborah, Patti and
myself. Nancy, Eric, Deborah and Patti were playing for the first
time. The Carcassonne game ended fairly quickly, so we pulled this
game out to fill the time before our lunch break. This is an easy
game to pick up and everyone seemed to get into the theme. This
game lasted about 20 minutes.
Settlers
of Catan.
Playing this game: Sandy, Pilar, Niel and
myself. Sandy and Niel were playing for the first time. This game
was made hard by the fact that no one could get a decent supply of
oar. They were on extreme numbered tiles, which seldom showed up.
We were getting a lot of sheep among us, which would've been great
for trading in for needed resources, but 7's were being rolled.
Pilar was most hurting for resources for most of the game. I pulled
out some excellent development cards to get longest road and
largest army, but Niel pulled one on me to get back longest road
and eventually win the game after about two hours.
As an aside, we played on the original edition of the game. I like this version because photographs were used for the tiles and resources.
Honor of
the Samurai.
Playing this game: Tony, Ian, Sandy, John,
and myself. Tony, Sandy, John and myself were playing for the first
time. This was a new one for me. I'm generally not big on card
games, so the fact that this game dragged on wore on me. The idea
is that you're a Samurai attached to a Daimyo. You build up an
army, collect worthwhile objects, bring in honorable wives, and
build fortresses, all to collect ki (which gives you more actions
per turn), strength (which gives you more dice to fight in battle),
and honor (which you need to collect to win the game.) Honor is
also spent to launch surprise attacks, steal things and avoid bad
things happening.
Tony sat quietly, never seeming to amass enough points to be a threat. I kept launching attacks in revenge for attacks launched on me. Ian kept amassing points which kept making him a target. Amazingly enough, the game ended with close scores, with Tony winning. After all, everyone kept spending points to pick on the other players, but Tony avoided all that and didn't spend as much points, retaining points for 2nd place. Ian amassed enough points early enough, that he could just wait out the ensuing few rounds, before time ran out. This game lasted about two and a quarter hours.
And what were the final standings at the tournament. I'll tell you if only because the names have all been mentioned in past session reports.
Andrew was first and won the nifty trophy with Danger Planet's logo. Ian was second after playing a tie-breaker round of Geister with Tony, who ended up third.
As though I didn't get enough gaming, I continued with a Private session. I played 2-player Tri-Color Penrose game, 3-player Bausack.
Tri-Color Penrose.
This is a prototype puzzle game
designed by Nancy. As a happy coincidence, Kate Jones at Kadon
games liked the game idea enough to start producing high-quality kites and
darts pieces for the Penrose pattern, though the rules haven't
been published yet.
Here's a summary of the rules: Start with a blank Penrose pattern for a game board. Place the starting island pieces. Then play pieces such that the same colored pieces don't share an edge. As soon as a color is forced, play is passed to the next player, unless no one catches the forced color. Play continues until the entire board is filled in. The winner is the person who placed the most pieces. The real fun is to observe the colored pattern emerge over time. There are rules for play when mistakes are caught.
And mistakes will be made... there is some kind of fatigue that happens when staring at this board. Niether Nancy nor I caught a few mistakes at a few points until later in the game. Nancy won by 13 points after two hours.
Bausack
Playing this game: Nancy, Dante, and myself. Nancy played
for the first time. This game continues the theme of pattern
development, with the added bonus of adding a balancing act. Played
with my variant.
As an aside, I actually found the Bandu rules at Hasbro's website, and it is different than my variant, but I like my variant better because it's a direct implementation of the spirit of those rules. After all, you'd want to keep the piece you select, and get specific people to suffer with unwanted pieces.
It's amazing when those pieces get used! Nancy won this time, while Dante and I were being unnecessarily tricky.
Got together with Nancy to test the Tri-color Penrose Game on a new board, as illustrated in Kadon's 2000-2001 catalog. Ran into a "Ko" situation using her rules, so we declared that a "Ko" situation allows you to execute a patch play that branches, following one branch at a time. Also tried a dynamic setup rather than the original fixed setup notion.
That board played faster, being a smaller board. Also, because it has more symetrical patterns, a run for each player lasted longer.
Gaming at Danger Planet: 6-player Robo Rally, 4-player Munchkin, 3-player Elements.
Robo
Rally.
Players were: Tom, Matt, Andrew, Neil, Sharron,
and myself. Neil arranged to have Robo Rally and its expansions
available this evening. I selected two boards at random (as I
usually do--two boards make for a satisfying time length.) They
turned out to be a board from the original game and a board from
one of the expansions. Then I arranged them randomly, then added
two checkpoints (out and back which makes for a good length of
time, and lots of interaction.) We started with four people, and
early in the game, it's easy enough to add more people and still
have fun. There was a lot of chaos at the first checkpoint because
of all the twisty conveyor belts, and we had a winner after two
hours of play: Matt.
Munchkin.
Players were: Ian, Tom, Sharron, and myself. Munchkin is a
heavily themed card game in which players are adventurers exploring
a dungeon together. Well, that's where cooperation ends, because
the winner is the person who gets out with the most treasure. The
game lasted about 45 minutes to an hour. Ian had an impressive
start which made the rest of us gang up on him. My elf got
experience for helping other players so I was helping Tom and
Sharron by fighting monsters and trading away items my character
couldn't use.
Ian's Elements.
Players were: Ian, Tom and myself.
Played Ian's prototype game of Elements. This time, I got to try a
three player game which had interesting dynamics, being played on a
different board, in that one of the center elements that must be
played to cast spells was unavailable. Didn't get to finish the
game after about 20 minutes before the store closed.
Private session: 2-player Icehouse Volcano, 2-player Icehouse Zendo.
Icehouse
Volcano.
Players were Nancy and myself. I brought out
my newly bought Icehouse pieces to play this puzzle game a few
times. I knew Nancy would like it because she's into these sorts of
thinking games.
Icehouse
Zendo.
Players were Nancy and myself. We really should
play this with more players but I wanted Nancy to get familiar with
the rules so we can draw other people into the game later on. This
is a fun game of deduction, maybe even induction if you believe the
full document of the game. I had a killer puzzle that I'll share
with you, if you need a hard one: A koan has Buddha nature if
any red pieces are played, the number of pips on the red pieces is
the number of pieces in play.
Private session: 2-player Killer Bunny Needs a Ham.
Devil
Bunny Needs a Ham.
Players were Nancy and myself. This
is a fun little filler that both of us played for the first time
(before going to see "How to Kill Your Neighbor's Dog" at the
Coolidge Center Theater, both the movie and the theater both worth
seeing.) This is a Cheapass Game that's a good filler if you need a
gaming fix and don't have much time. It's easy enough to figure out
the winning strategy, so the game comes out as a die-rolling fest.
We actually didn't have enough time to finish the game, after 20
minutes of play.
Private session. 2-player Very Clever Pipe Game, 2-player Agora, 2-player Carcassonne.
Very
Clever Pipe Game.
This a favorite of Nancy's and mine
because it's very simple to play, and requires some thought and
some tactics to play. Played three games, each lasting about 20
minutes. Most of these games ended with quite a few tiles left on
the table. Is that because we're getting better at it and keep the
opponent from scoring?
Agora.
This is a brand new game, and Nancy and I played it for
the first time. It's another clever tile-laying game that's
enjoyable. You draw a tile, check if any rewards (festivals) or
disasters (fire and flood) strike, then place the tile representing
shops divided up in different ways, and buy one if you'd like.
Income is based on access to shops and you and opponents spend time
cutting off shops, or expanding shops. Expanding shops could be
detrimental because disasters strike only the biggest shops.
Overall, we caught on that it's better to keep a tie for shop sizes
to prevent disasters and create shops with the highest scoring
opportunities. We played a game for twenty minutes.
Carcassonne
with River Expansion.
This is my brand new copy of the
game, and Nancy and I played it to keep with the tile-laying theme.
It was a pleasant game and very cooperative, but I don't recall
anything noteworthy happening short of one square that could never
be filled because of the oddball tiles adjacent to it. It's very
frustrating that the scorecard wraps around so many times, with
only spaces for 50 points and our scores going over a hundred! Is
there a better scorecard out there or shall I create my own? We
played the game for about and hour.
Private session. Game played: 2-player Java.
Java.
Les and I played Java. This was Les' first time playing it.
Les learned that scoring reservoirs early on is a good thing. After
all, it's the best deal for the action points you spend. We ended
up going for the big, clever scores when creating villages, so the
board developed in two big chunks on each side of the board. This
meant that a lot of small villages weren't even touched for the
easy scores. We each gained a lot of altitude in our attempts to
expand villages and upgrade palaces. Most of the festivals were
lost by the person initiating them. Game ended after about one hour
and 45 minutes.
Danger Planet. Played 4-player Zombies, 4-player Tikal, 3-player Entdecker.
Zombies!!!
Players were Cindy, Rich, someone whose name I didn't get,
and myself. This game was just a filler game, and it was fun for
the 20 minutes I spent on it, though the game was far from over.
The idea is to build up the neighborhood in which zombies chase you
and the other players. Two of us were in a dead-end, and I could
see this game dragging to become no fun if that situation remained.
Reading reports on the Net, there are some rules that need to be
tweaked to keep with the spirit of the game, like the rule that
when a player dies, he comes back with health and bullets at the
town center. This seems to reward the player for dying, and the
spirit of the game should be that players are doing all they can to
escape the horror. Anyways, this has 100 soft plastic zombie
miniatures, which in itself is a cool thing, so it'll be nice to
find variants that make it worthwhile to play the game.
Tikal.
Players were: Matt, Tom, Adam, and myself. Tom and I
played this for the first time. This is a game in which
archeologists explore an area for temples and treasure. We tended
to set up guards on temples early on, splitting off on our own as
the board developed to create separate areas.
Afterwards, I read the rules off the Net. Some rules weren't adhered to which made the game less satisfactory after the fact. We didn't know that there were no restrictions to creating a base camp, except that a hex was empty of treasure and temples. I thought we needed explorers in a hex to create a base camp. We didn't restrict the number of guards, so I ended up setting them up at many temples. We didn't have any temple markers above level 8 in the draw pile. The game ended in two and a half hours (including the time to go over rules) with the most points going to the players who went after the treasure. Tom was a regular Indiana Jones in his treasure-hunting priorities.
Entdecker.
Players were: Adam, Mike and myself. We all played this
for the first time. This was the original German edition, and we
played with the Entdecker
(Discoverer) Soeding Variant. This is a game in which player
explore uncharted islands. They get points for discovering the
entire island and for whatever treasures are found on the island.
The points go to the highest ranking explorers on an island in case
many explorers are at the same island, with decreased scores for
each and every explorer on the island. It was a fun game with
interesting patterns as we went. The game lasted a little over an
hour, including going over the rules. There's no number scores, so
I noted the relative scores.
Private session. 4-player Robo Rally, 4-player Chrononauts.
Robo
Rally.
Players were: Doug, Jean, Shawn and myself.
Everyone played before, though Shawn needed a refresher. I set up a
two board and two checkpoint game, Jean selected the boards at
random to use. The other players were confused as to how robots
interact with the board. Jean and Doug played for fun while Shawn
and I played to win. Turned out that I had cards that let me go
straight to each checkpoint. The most confounding move came when
Jean and Doug went for a wrench for repairs and Jean had the
highest priority. I won after an hour of play.
Chrononauts
with the Lost
Identities Expansion.
Players were: Doug, Jean, Shawn
and myself. I was the only player who played before. People played
the card that let us swap hands twice. Each time, I was regretful
because each of those hands had a card I wanted. Shawn played the
"Your Parents Never Met" on Jean. When we found out she had the
cockroach, we all sighed with relief, even Jean, because it's hard
to achieve and because it messes with everyone's goals. I kept
seeing other people with the artifacts I needed for my mission.
Everyone paniked when I caused 12 paradoxes (because thirteen will
end the game with no winners) so that was quickly addressed. In the
end, Shawn won because he needed any four artifacts to win. The
game lasted about an hour.
Private session. 2-player Crokinole.
Crokinole.
Players were Dante and myself. We never
played before. I ordered a Crokinole board off eBay from Sawdust
Jim, after reading many positive reports about the game on the Net.
The board itself is a nice piece of work with a base and rail made
of pine and the 23 1/2 inch playing surface made of laminated
birch. The ditch is stained a cinamon color.
I like variety, so I'm on the lookout for different types of games that seem to be played by different groups of people. After all, there seems to be the German designer strategy games, puzzle games, role-playing games, dexterity games, collectable card games, and I'd hate to limit myself to one slice of the pie.
I practiced flicking the discs and I was surprised at how fast the discs zipped across the board. Dante and I played a game without scoring just to get a feel for the game. He was very impressed with the look of the board and the physics of the game.
We played three games for real. I felt relaxed and flicked discs without really trying, which meant that many of my shots came short of the 20 point target and made shots difficult for Dante. He eventually gave up in frustration calling me a "sore winner," citing that parlor games like this were created (around 1860) at a time of syphilus and people withdrew to play games like this to get away from it all. Um... What's the connection? :-)
One rule we didn't play was that all discs that were hit when a player misses an opponents disc get removed. We just removed the disc that was shot. I thought it would be ok because it meant a weaker player would still have discs on the board. Though it meant the board was crowded with pieces from the stronger player. This wasn't a problem until one of the hit discs actually went in the 20 point target. We removed that without scoring.
Crokinole links:
Your Move Games, Looney Games Night. 2,3-player Aquarius, 2,3-player Icehouse Pikemen, 5-player Fluxx, 8,9-player Werewolf.
Aquarius.
Played two games of 3-player Aquarius with Kat and
Racheal, and a game of 2-player Aquarius with Kat. I was the new
player.
This is a tile laying game using colorful (60s psychodelic art) cards. A card will have one through four patterns which have to match, on a side, a pattern already in play. There are additional cards that affect the cards in play, hands, or goals. Each player gats a pattern as a goal and has to create a run of seven cards in play matching that pattern.
This is a simple game that plays fairly quickly (about 15-20 minutes per game.) It's fairly straightforward to win except the action cards that cause players to swap hands, swap goals, reshuffle and redeal goals, move played cards and pick up played cards. These cards were a good way to thwart someone who's ahead and to turn around a bad hand.
Icehouse
Pikemen.
Played two games of 2-player Pikemen with
Dennis, and a game of 3-player Pikemen with Jason and Dennis. I was
the new player.
This is a game using Icehouse pieces setup on a chess board. Upright pieces defend, otherwise pieces move and attack in the direction they're pointing for any distance, ending a turn by changing the way it was pointing. With an upright piece, you can only tip it and point it in a new direction. Any tipped piece can be captured, but defending pieces can only be captured by bigger pieces.
I like this game because it's simple enough, but there's a strategy that I just couldn't see right off the bat, having lost every game. The last game, both players seemed to gang up on me, Dennis leaving a three point pikeman open for capture threatening my piece, and Jason deciding to follow up on capturing my one point piece and leaving Dennis' three point piece alone.
Each game was about 15-20 minutes.
Fluxx.
Played a 5-player game of Fluxx with Jason, Rob, ???, and
Ronald. I was the new player.
This is a game in which you draw a card then play a card. From this point, any and all rules can change with rules printed on the cards. There is no goal until someone plays one. There are action which let players fiddle with played or unplayed cards, and keepers which are played in front of players to meet some goals.
The game is fairly chaotic, and feels like it slows down when cards are played to throttle back the chaos. Ronald won by taking advantage of a played goal card by stealing a keeper card he needed to win.
This game was about 30 minute.
Werewolf.
Played three games of Werewolf with eight or nine people,
with the ten people who retired to Redbones after Your Move Games
closed.
This is a game in which cards are dealt out face down so that players can play the role on the card. There is one moderator, one seer, and two werewolves. The rest of the players are villagers. The moderator sets the mood, each turn, telling everyone to close their eyes as they go to sleep for the night. Then the werewolves open their eyes and choose a character to tear to bits, then they close their eyes. Then the seer opens his eyes and points to a character to find out if that character is a werewolf or not, then closes his eyes. Then players open their eyes, and begin a debate to figure out who to lynch as a werewolf. The twist is that the seer knows the status of each additional character each turn, but will surely have the werewolves turn on him if he reveals he's a seer. The werewolves will try to throw suspicion off themselves onto the other players. Characters nominate a character to be lynch, and after a defensive argument, vote whether to lynch him or not. Once lynched, he reveals what character he was playing.
I think the werewolves won every game except the first. (The first game, I was a werewolf so, of course, people had to gang up on me, after eliminating my werewolf partner without much ado. :-)
Players couldn't weed through who was playing what role in subsequent games and ended up letting the werewolves win.
This is a game that's more fun with more people, and you need at least eight people to play. We had some misunderstanding about how many characters needed to be alive during each turn, and how many characters needed to be alive at the end of the game to declare a winner. Each game lasted about 15-20 minutes.
Danger Planet. 4-player Tri-color Penrose, 3-player Chaos Tiles, 2,3-player Nexus, 2-player Fluxx.
Actually, while we were waiting for other players, Nancy and I played a bit of The Very Clever Tile Game. We didn't get to finish the game.
Tri-color Penrose.
Players were Cindy, Ian, Nancy,
Vitas. This was Cindy's first time playing the game. Nancy was
eager to try out some changes to the rules based on feedback from
previous playtests at Danger Planet. (Ian being
one of the people giving good feedback.)
A quick recap of the game, players add Penrose pieces to a Penrose board making sure the same colors don't share an edge. If a space is forced a color because two edges have two different colors, another player can call "Penrose" to take a turn laying tiles starting with the forced space.
As new rules, players are allowed two free plays during the game, and can call "dibs" on inevitable forced plays. We used the smaller board because Ian was on a time limit.
Ian and I called dibs at incorrect points in the game so we lost a chance to get a turn when a real forced move came up. Ian left before the game ended, so we played on without him (not even adding to his tile pile when we entered patched play.) Cindy was very meticulous in playing her moves, and won the game after an hour of play.
Scoring is relative. The lowest score (meaning the player who played the most pieces) wins.
Chaos
Tiles.
Players were Cindy, Nancy and myself. We all
played for the first time.
This is a tile-laying puzzle game with two different-sized pieces, 40 Kays (which contain a concave angle) and 50 Veks (which contain convex angles.) We played the first variation of the game (Chaos Omelet) which allows us to start with 5 points of tiles. Kays count as a half-point and Veks count as one point. The first tile is laid and the game begins. A Player lays a tile touching the side of any played tile. Players may make additional free moves if a tile can touch other tiles on three sides. A restriction that a 20 degree angle is not allowed. Points are scored when a clump of tiles with the same colored dots is expanded by by multiplying the sum of like-colored dots on tiles.
This game was hard. We created a blob that was hard to keep adding to it. Cindy drew all Kays, and that made it difficult to find good moves for her. We only played a free move twice the whole game.
In the end, I won, after abut an hour, because I made one of two plays that actually created a product.
Next time I want allow transfers (variation 2) which may make the game quicker and easier.
Nexus.
Players were Cindy, Nancy and myself. This was the first time any
of us played the game.
Nexus is a tile-laying game in which players try to claim nodes by playing a card, scoring completed nexuses, and laying a token on a node in an incomplete nexus. The highest rank via tokens scores a complete nexus. Add unoccupied nodes to the highest rankers score.
Cindy had to leave the first game early, so Nancy and I continued playing three games. What seems surprising is that players should place a token on higher scoring nodes, which don't count for a score, but increase rank. This is an interesting balance, added to the fact that many scoring possibilities develop during the game, and a player has to choose which to pursue and which to ignore. We don't play for a high score so the score seems to slowly increment or quickly swing. It was about 15 minutes per game.
An interesting dynamic is that a tie in rank means no one scores. This means with more than two people, additional players could close off scoring opportunities for two players competing for a particular nexus.
Fluxx.
Players were Nancy and myself. This was Nancy's first time playing
the game.
I liked the game enough to try it some more. I suspected that this game is more fun and chaotic with more players, but doing is knowing. The game slowed down because we ended up with empty hands and had to play everything we drew. After fifteen minutes, just as the store was closing, I played a goal that allowed Nancy to win with the five Keepers she accumulated. (Have to shuffle a new deck better next time! :-)
In conclusion, I have to add that it's satisfying to play games that create a pattern on the table. Even if I lose, there is a sense of accomplishment, and the sense of seeing something new.
I took a trip to my hometown of Rochester, NY, to visit friends and family. I got a lot of board gaming in. I'll just note the gaming highlights during this trip. I ended up playing a lot of Crokinole because I wanted to show off the beautiful new board.
3-player Crokinole, 3-player Mage Knight: Talisman.
Crokinole.
Players were Dan, Christa and myself. Dan
and Christa played for the first time.
Mage Knight: Talisman.
Players were Dan, Christa
(when she wasn't distracted by her infant :-), and myself. We all
experimented with this for the first time. For an interesting twist
on an old favorite, this is a variant I played with combining Mage
Knight: Dungeons (MKD) rules and the Second Edition Talisman board
game. At minimum, use a Mage Knight Starter pack for two players
and an additional booster pack for every additional player.
We played with a time limit of an hour and a half with no winners. Dan thought the game would last longer with this variant. I didn't think that would be possible.
As an aside, Their son seems to have a taste for the Chrononauts rules. We stopped him before he swallowed the cover!
Mage Knight: Dungeons links:
Talisman links:
2-player Entdecker, 2-player Fossil, 2-player Crokinole, 2-player Nexus, 2,3,4-player Crokinole.
TomP is an easy-going, laid-back gamer. He likes to try different games and doesn't get overly uptight about winning because the game play is the fun.
Original
German Entdecker.
Players were TomP and myself. TomP
played for the first time. Our game lasted an hour. Scoring is
relative.
Fossil.
Players were TomP and myself. I played for the first
time.
This is an interesting abstract strategy game in which tiles representing a collection of nine piece fossils are laid on a grid. Each player places a pawn on board and takes the tile. Each turn, a player moves a pawn horizontally or vertically as far as he wants to another tile and takes the tile. You score by completing fossils and scoring the number of points on the tiles.
I didn't catch on to the strategy initially and let TomP collect up high scoring tiles while I tried to get a complete fossil. Game lasted a half hour.
Crokinole.
Players were TomP and myself. TomP played
for the first time.
Nexus.
Players were TomP and myself. TomP played for the first
time. TomP wasn't particularly interested in this sort of game.
Crokinole.
Players were (at various times) Cherie,
Jason, Kerry and myself. Cherie, Jason and Kerry played for the
first time.
As gamers go, Jason is very emotional and feels the ups and downs of winning. Kerry is somewhat sensitive, bowing out of one game because Cherie was intent on competing with me. Cherie is very competitive.
2-player Crokinole, 2-player Settlers of Catan, 2-player Nexus, 2-player Fluxx, 2-player Entdecker.
Crokinole.
Players were Don and myself. Don never
played before. Don was a good sport.
Crokinole.
Players were Jackie and myself. Jackie
player for the first time. Jackie had a real problem hitting the
discs and spacial games make her ill.
Settlers
of Catan.
Players were Jackie and myself. Jackie played
for the first time. This game is always a good standby, I thought,
and Jackie got into it. It was a close game, too, with us competing
for longest road and getting enough resources to keep building at a
fairly even rate.
Nexus.
Players were Jackie and myself. Jackie played for the
first time. This is another spacial game that didn't work for her.
Game lasted about a half hour.
Fluxx.
Players were Jackie and myself. Jackie played for the
first time. We played three games for 45 minutes. This game would
work better with more people, but it's a nice low thought activity.
I won the first and third game. Jackie won the second.
Original
German Entdecker.
Players were Jackie and myself. Jackie
played for the first time. Jackie did enjoy this game. Game ended
after an hour and forty-five minutes.
4-player Crokinole, 5-player Apples to Apples.
Crokinole.
Players were Shawn, Doug, TomW and myself.
Shawn, Doug and TomW played for the first time.
Apples to
Apples.
Players were Jean, Shawn, TomW, Doug, Vitas. I
was playing for the first time.
Apples to Apples is a silly, subjective game. We were playing with all the expansions. There are two decks of cards. One deck contains a word and a list of like words. This deck is passed from player to player who'll act as arbitrator. The other deck is a word or phrase with an associated quote. Each player has a hand of seven of these cards and choose one to be judged by the moderator. The moderator shuffles and reveals all the cards passed to him at once and judges which card best matches the card he drew.
So, this is a game of word association and knowing something about the player judging the cards. One anecdote is that one arbitrator drew "Mechanical." Of the cards passed to him to be judged, one was "My Love Life."
We played two games. Jean won both of them. (She's the biggest fan of the game. :-)
2-player Crokinole.
Crokinole.
Players were Frank and myself. Frank was a
new player.
2,3-player Crokinole.
Crokinole.
Players were Allen, Jeff and myself. Allen
and Jeff were new players. Allen was a very aggressive and
competitive player.
Then, players were Chris, Whitney and myself. Chris and Whitney were new players. Whitney was a very intense player. Afterwards, she looked up the game on the Internet. Chris is into woodworking and now considers making a board himself. This game is amazing in how it gets people's interest.
2-player Java, 2-player Entdecker, 2-player Stephenson's Rocket, 2-player Chrononauts, 2-player Icehouse Volcano.
Java.
Players were TomP and myself. TomP was a new player. TomP was
driving me nuts because he didn't even take time to make good
moves... just any moves would do. Great for short down times,
though. Game ended in about an hour. (A record?)
Original
German Entdecker.
Players were TomP and myself. TomP
requested to try this again.
Stephenson's
Rocket.
Players were TomP and myself. Both of us were
new players.
This is an interesting strategic game. During the game, you can do two things from any combination of three choices: extend a railway (getting stock in it), take a resource token, build a train station. Connecting to a city means the player with the most tokens from the city gets money, second place gets half that. Connecting to a railway town means the player with the most stations on the railway line gets money, second place gets half that. Connecting two railways merges one into the other, meaning a cash bonus and stock trade.
Starting the game is bewildering because it's not obvious what we should be doing beyond just diving in. Then a strategy forms as we figure out what to do in reaction to what the other player does.
Game lasted about an hour and a half.
Chrononauts.
Players were TomP and myself. TomP played for the first
time.
This had to be the shortest game of Chrononauts ever. TomP ended up winning the mission in about ten minutes, playing four artifacts, three of which he needed, two of which I needed to win my mission!!!
Icehouse
Volcano.
Players were TomP and myself. TomP played for
the first time. I set up the game with the alternate pattern I
found on the web.
2-player Stephenson's Rocket, 4-player Crokinole.
Stephenson's
Rocket.
Players were Harry and myself. Harry was new to
the game.
Did it help start the game knowing how the game plays? Nope. Still seems overwhelming and I can't even suggest good things to do, until we're into the game a bit.
Crokinole.
Players were Donna, Shannon, Shannon's
mother (M) and myself. Donna, Shannon, and M were new to the
game.
Shannon learned to relax and just play, though she kept hitting the pieces too hard. Donna and M were very competitive, but didn't reach that state of becoming one with the discs that is so necessary to win. :-)
Deathmatch (winner of one round... it was getting late)
Private session. 2-player Chez Dork, 2-player Stephenson's Rocket, 2-player Primordial Ooze.
Chez
Dork.
Players were Nancy and myself. I played for the
first time.
Chez Dork is a fun, themed card game in which players play characters who are obsessed Chez Dork is a fun, themed card game in which players play characters who are obsessed collectors of stuff like miniatures, dice, role-playing games. Characters have permanent obsessions and advantages and disadvantages. During the game, players can buy stuff from their hand, scoring more points if the stuff is something they're obsessed about. They can change obsessions as well--their own or their opponents. Players can play special cards which are twists to the game to benefit their characters or hinder their opponents.
Nancy and I played two games. It's obviously a better game with more people because then players can trade and auction off stuff. The game played quickly, perhaps because of the special cards. During the first game, Nancy was able to boost her income many which gave her enough money to buy enough stuff to win. During the second game, I was able to double the value of the expensive stuff I was obsessed over to win the game.
I wonder, though... Nancy played a card that allowed her to auction off any stuff in play to gain money... She played it on my stuff! I couldn't find any wording on the card to prove this wasn't allowed, but it seems to go against the logic of the game. What do you think?
The first game was about a half hour including time to get familiar with the rules. The second game was about 20 minutes.
Chez Dork Links:
Stephenson's
Rocket.
Players were Nancy and myself. Nancy never
played before.
Let's see if I come up with a new way of looking at this game...
Stephenson's Rocket is a nicely themed game about developing the first railways in England to acquire the most money. The idea is to connect railway lines to cities and railway towns. Cities have resources, so connecting to them scores if you have dibs on those resources. Railway towns have passengers, so railways with the most stations scores for connecting to them. Play continues until all the tracks are laid or all the railway lines have merged.
We played a close game ending with a single railway line after an hour and a half of play. Nancy skipped a few scoring opportunities in her eagerness to merge lines which is why she lost, but it seems games are often close so it's best to grab every little bit of scoring possible.
Stephenson's Rocket Links:
Primordial Ooze. ("Primapradis gyvybes saltinis")
Players were Nancy and myself. We both played this for the first
time.
I snatched up this import from the most unlikely of places, a catalog from Lithuania called "Balandis Zaidimu." It has the most unusual components I've seen. Each player gets a container of clay and a container of that Nickleodeon goo in their color. Each player gets two actions per turn from three choices. 1) Lay down two cubic centimeters of clay which becomes the bed (game board) on which play continues, 2) Use a divot (chosen from two sizes, requiring one or two action depending on size) to make an impression into the clay bed of a size of one or two cubic centimeters, 3) Pour five cubic centimeters of goo onto the clay bed. The first player to fill a certain combined size of impressions wins. (We played to ten cubic centimeters for a quick game.)
The real fun of the game comes from stacking clay and making impressions such that when the goo runs over the first impression, it fills another impression. We keep track of how much was poured from the markings on the goo container (rounded down), but all the goo must be poured because part of the gameplay is managing the limited supply of goo, so it's a good thing we had a piece of plastic that acted as a tablecloth.
We played best two out of three. Each game lasted a half hour.
This is not really a session report, but an interesting gaming-related account that I'd like to put in this journal.
Chaos
Tiles.
I gave my dear friend's nine year old daughter
Chaos Tiles for her birthday. We first tried to put together the
suggested pattern in its vinal container. She found that very
satisfying. Then we played a game without scoring, though I later
found she could multiply, so scoring would have been an additional
learning experience. But she got frustrated over the rules for free
moves. I should have kept it simple for the first time out and let
her appreciate the developing patterns, which she liked in just
solving the suggested pattern.
I also gave her Wedgits, which are construction toys. I wasn't sure she'd be interested at her age in such a thing (but my friend who works at Learning Express highly reccomended it.) She loved it, stacking the toys to amazing heights in the interesting ways that the toys fits together. It surprised me to see she put it away neatly stacked, rather than just dumping the toys in the box. I'm thinking that there's a nice Bandu/Bausack variant that could work with Wedgets.
Danger Planet open gaming session. 2,3-player Icehouse Volcano, 4-player Carcassonne, 4-player Beer, 3-player Chez Dork.
Icehouse
Volcano.
Players were Ralph and myself, then Ralph,
Andrew and myself. Rich and Andrew played for the first time.
Interesting that this style of game was new to Rich and Andrew, and it was nice to expand their board gaming horizons with multi-purpose gaming pieces. The two-player game went fairly quickly, and the three-player game slowed down with the additional consideration of benifitting oneself while minimizing benefits to the other players.
Carcassonne
with River Expansion.
Players were Rick, Andrew, Ralph
and myself. We all played before.
This ended up being an interesting game in that the board remained fairly rectangular towards the beginning of the game. Also, the farms were broken up a lot more than the previous games we played where there was just one big farm.
Beer: the
Card Game
Players were Rick, Andrew, Ralph and myself.
Ralph brought the game and taught it to the rest of us newbies.
This is a game in which five bar cards get dealt face up in the center of the table. These cards are beer and various bar items like pool tables, dart board and ATM's. Each player gets a hand of patron cards which basically enhance a player's turn or hinder other player's turn. Game is played until a last call card is drawn. The bar cards are reshuffled with the last call card removed and a bar closing card added (which will end the game after another round of play when drawn.) The person who ends up with the most beer cards wins.
The first game we played lasted about five minutes and ended in a tie. between Ralph and myself. (Can you say luck of the draw? :-)
The next game, we divided the shuffled deck in half, and shuffled the last call card into the bottom half of the bar deck. This definitely lengthened the game but didn't change the arbitrary feel of the game. Andrew won with a tie broken by having more money.
Chez
Dork.
Players were Jimmy, Nancy and myself. Jimmy
played for the first time.
Since the store owners stayed late to play their own miniatures game downstairs, Jimmy, Nancy and I took advantage of it by playing this game.
Nancy played Carson again. (Is it because she's obsessed over collecting lots of different stuff herself? :-) I played Matt and Jimmy played Gilly (which wasn't such a good combination in a three player game since they can't play bad cards on each other, so we ended up ganging up on Nancy.)
Somehow, Jimmy won with a lot of stuff.
B20 session. 4-player Tri-color Penrose, 6-player Royal Turf, 4-player Puerto Rico, 3-player Icehouse Volcano, 4-player Chez Dork.
Tri-color Penrose.
Players were Kelli, Nancy, Terry,
and myself. Kelli and Terry were new players.
Kelli grasped the game quickly and was making the most of her turns. I was sloppy having played the games enough that I didn't think I had to be careful, except that Nancy and Kelli were good. Terry had a problem seeing the patterns. (There is a class of people who don't grasp the patterns in puzzle games, and there's nothing wrong with that. It's all just for fun.) However, Terry entered patch play which let him make a comeback.
Scores are relative.
Royal
Turf.
Players were Phil, Greg, Terry, Paul, Kelli and
myself. I was a new player.
Royal Turf is an engaging horse racing game. The mechanics are interesting in that, for each race, each horse gets a new movement card which matches up symbols on a die with the number of spaces to move. This gives players an idea of the odds for a horse. Players have four bets they make on horses. The bets are made face down in each of the values: 2, 1, 1, 0. The 0 bet is to fake out players about which horse he's supporting. The more bets on a single horse, the smaller the payoff when he wins, places or shows. Bets to the horse in last place are paid to the bank. If the lead horse at the half-way point wins, those players will get an extra 100.
Each player takes a turn rolling the die. Then the player picks a horse to move. After moving the horse, its movement card is shifted so that it can't be moved again until all the other horses get to move.
The game lasts for three races of one lap each, and the last race pays double.
Interesting that the horse with the poorest odds won the first race. Phil was the only player to bet on the horse and it turned out to be a bet of 0. But he made up for it in the end.
In general, this game seems like it'll be more fun with more players, who can get into the theme of the game and cheering for their horses. Strategy is as simple as The player may move his own horse to help him win, or move an opponents horse on low rolls to keep him from making a lot of progress. Otherwise, it's a die rolling fest, which is fun in its own way.
Puerto
Rico.
Players were Phil, Kelli, Greg, and myself. Kelli
and I were new players.
Puerto Rico is a game about developing plantations and trading products. The rules are fairly involved, so I'll keep to describing the high points of the mechanics.
Players have a choice of six roles to play during their turn. Everyone will take on that role, but the player who picks the role gets a bonus that the other players won't. The roles are Mayor (attracting colonists to work on plantations and in buildings), Settler (which allows players to develop new plantations), Builder (which allows players to build), Craftsman (which allows player to develop goods from their plantations), Trader (which allows players to sell a good to the trading house), Captain (which allows players to place goods on a trading ship), Prospector (which only offers the player who selected it extra money). At the end of each round, role cards that weren't selected get money for the player who selects it next round.
Buildings give benefits to players. They can: develop a resource from a plantation into goods, give a discount when obtaining a building, give extra colonists, on so on. Better buildings being beyond cheap.
Victory points are earned by putting goods on a trading ship. The winner is the person who has the most victory points at the end of the game, with ties broken by amount of money left. The game ends when there are no more colonists to come to work for the players.
There's more embellishments to the game, but that's a good brief working description.
The other players picked buildings which kept a high supply of colonists coming in. Without colonists, I kept creeping along at a slow pace. At the end, everyone, but me, could afford a large building which gave a good amount of victory points. I should've picked the right buildings and spent all my money doing it early on.
Overall, this game has a lot going on at the same time, so it'll be interesting to try different strategies each game.
Our game lasted about two hours.
Here are other takes on the session with the games I played.
Here are additional first impressions from the session.
Icehouse
Volcano.
Players were Brian, Nancy and myself. Brian
was a new player.
Chez
Dork.
Players were Greg, Brian, Nancy and myself. Greg
and Brian were new players.
Mike & Teresa's open house. 2,4-player Icehouse Volcano.
Icehouse
Volcano.
Players were Donald, Chris, Anaka and myself.
Donald, Chris and Anaka were new players.
Chris threw the game, collecting all the colors after getting frustrated with finding good moves in the game. Like in life, she's very impatient. :-)
Players were Donald and myself.
Danger Planet. 4-player Siesta, 4-player Stephenson's Rocket, 4-player Tri-color Penrose.
Siesta.
Players were Karl, Ralph, Nancy and myself. We were all new
players.
Siesta is a pleasant abstract game in which you place three different tokens on a game board, a sun, rooftop and shadow. Each shadow cast by a sun across rooftop(a) scores a point, and there's a bonus for casting from both sides exclusively. Overall, very engaging. Each game lasted about 30 minutes.
Stephenson's
Rocket.
Players were Karl, Ralph, Nancy, Vitas. Karl
and Ralph played for the first time.
This is the first time I played with four players. The game's dynamic changes with more people. I ended up taking less turns before the game ended. Tokens were taken and stations were placed much faster. Karl, Ralph and Nancy ended up getting good leads by placing their stations in the more lucrative south. I ended up placing my stations on the other side of the map and didn't get to merge the railways in the north with the railways in the south.
Nancy bowed out about two-thirds into the game to playtest her own game.
Game lasted about an hour and a half.
Tri-color Penrose.
Players were Nancy, Karl, Jimmy,
and myself. We all played before.
Even with pieces added to Karl's pool during patch play by Jimmy, Karl recovered with his own patch play to win.
Game lasted about 45 minutes on Nancy's smaller (standard) board.
Scores are relative.
Siesta.
Players were Nancy, Karl, Jimmy, and myself. Jimmy was the new
player.
We gave this another shot with only a little time left. We ended the game short (after 15 minutes) when the store closed.
As an aside, another group was playing a marathon game of Munchkin with the expansion "Unnatural Axe." Lots of laughs coming from that direction! :-)
Miniatures paint party. 3-player Carcassonne.
Carcassonne.
Players were Mike, Teresa and myself. Mike and Teresa
played for the first time.
This game is nice because it's fairly co-operative, in spite of the competition for the highest score. Every game I played, people would point out possible plays. I thought this would be a good one to try with Mike because he dislikes competitive games.
Teresa had the highest score towards the beginning. Mike made a strong comeback during the middle of the game. I came in from behind at the end of the game scoring farms. I'm especially pleased that I played a move that blocked Teresa from scoring the full points on a citadel and a town.
Click here to see how the board looked after scoring. We used meeples to keep track of which towns were scored for farming, and removed the rest as we scored partials.
Private session. 2-player Starbase Jeff, 2-player Entdecker.
Starbase
Jeff.
Players were Nancy and myself. We both played for
the first time.
I enjoy tile-laying games, as does Nancy, so I was looking forward to trying this one. The game is about connecting modules to open ends of a starbase. Each player has a deck of modules in his color. Each module has a cost, except the caps which have a payout. Costs and payouts go into and out of a pot. Connecting a module though other players' modules to one of your own requires a payment directly to the other players.
Each round of the game went fairly quickly, so we played about five rounds. We used tokens to represent money, and I ended up with more tokens, though I didn't keep an exact score. I can see this being a quick filler game in the future.
Click here to see how the final board looked after scoring.
Entdecker,
the original German version
using the Soeding variant.
Player were Nancy and myself. Nancy played for the first time.
I was ahead for most of the game, scoring a few small islands and a large sized island. Nancy scored many small islands but built up a moderately sized island for herself. This pushed her ahead of my score. Then she ended up with more treasure tokens than me which pushed her score even higher (starting on a second lap on the score track, which I never saw happen before.)
Click here to see how the board looked after scoring.
Looney Games Night at Your Move Games. 6-player Zendo, 5-player Volcano. Using Icehouse pieces.
Icehouse Zendo.
Players were Julie, Ben, Karl,
Jeremy, ???, and myself. We all played before.
I came up with a hard one that sumped everyone for many turns. For each color in the koan, the sum of the number of pips on the pieces of any one color is the total number of pieces in the koan. Julie pulled out a very good example koan and solution, a set of two three-pip pieces in three colors. That stumped me for a counter-example. The sum of the pips on all the pieces divided by the number of colors is the number of pieces in the koan. Her rule was a superset of mine. Now I know that I could've provided a counter-example of taking her koan and swapping one color for another. Julie got that one, because I couldn't come up with the counter-example quickly (and the owner of the pieces wanted to leave. :-)
Icehouse Volcano.
Players were Karl, Ben, Jeremy,
Julie and myself.
Except for me, this was a fairly close game, though Karl made a good impression early in the game by getting many pieces at once.
Danger Planet open gaming. 4-player Abduction, 3-player Chez Dork, 4-player Elements.
Abduction.
Players were Cindy, Rich, Ralph and myself. Cindy, Rich
and I played for the first time.
This is a game in which players play characters who wake up in a holding cell on a spaceship. Players play cards and move through the ship to get to the exit. Only one character will escape. Rooms, items and events make up the cards. Players get to take three actions per turn, and they can play events on other players' turns.
Cindy was able to pull out a win. Click here for a photo of the end game.
I like the concept. However, it was easy to get through the entire deck, which meant that all those cards that hinder any player winning keep get put back into play.
Abduction link:
Chez
Dork.
Players were Chris, Cindy and myself. Cindy was
new to the game.
Cindy won with a score of 25 playing Gilly, by collecting up extra money that had her rolling in stuff. I played Carson and Chirs played Igor. Click here for a photo of the end game.
Ian's Elements.
Players were Nancy, Jordan, Ian and
myself. We all played before.
Ian made some minor tweaks to the rules, and we played as teams to reduce the chaos Ian noticed in four-player games. I still fins the game engaging because the strategy isn't obvious. It pivots on second guessing what the other players will play and playing spells that would take priority. When Ian and Jordan teamed up, they seemed to have a single mindset and their play complimented each other.
First, it was Nancy and Ian against Jordan and me. Team members played across from each other. Nancy and Ian won.
Second, it was Ian and Jordan against Nancy and me. Team members played adjacent to each other. Ian and Jordan won.
Though we experimented to see if adjacency made a difference in game play, it wasn't clear that it did.
My best buddy, Paul, visited for the weekend, so we got a lot of gaming in.
Private session at Papa Razzi. 2-player Button Men.
Button
Men.
Players were Paul and myself. We both played for
the first time.
Button Men is a quick and simple game that was a fun dice-fest. Each player gets a button that has a list of five numbers. Each number represents a die with that many sides. Each turn, a player uses a die try to match or exceed a value of another die in a one-on-one battle to capture it. Alternatively, a player uses many dice to match one die in a many-to-one battle to capture it. Dice used to capture a die must be re-rolled, then the next player gets a turn. A round is played when all dice of one player are captured, then players score the number of sides captured plus half the number of sides remaining.
I got this game with the Zombie game set from Cheapass Games which I received as a gift. Since it was there, we gave it a shot and had fun. I played Hannah and Paul played Kublai. We forgot to score the half sides for dice that weren't captured for the first three games.
After the first game, Paul realized that, not only should he consistently capture more sides, but he should keep an eye on keeping me from capturing higher numbers with many-to-one captures.
Button Men links:
Private session. 2-player Star Wars: The Queen's Gambit.
Star Wars:
The Queen's Gambit.
Players were Paul and myself.
Another close game! This one lasted three hours. I played the Naboo forces and Paul played the Federation forces. Things were tense early on because each of us focused on different things. I generally went after Darth Maul and pushed Anakin along, while Paul generally went after the palace guards and the planetside forces.
Qui-gon and Darth Maul bit it by mid-game. Obi-won was seriously hurt so he only made hit-and-run attacks in the palace. The Naboo forces planetside bit the dust. Then it was a tense, if fairly quick, palace battle while we watched Anakin get closer to his target. In the end, all Naboo's forces but Queen Amadala and her decoy were wiped out giving the Federation a victory.
Found out we missed two rules. (Should've reviewed them quickly before playing.) MMT's and AAT's went through the shield even though they shouldn't have, and we didn't draw bonus cards for defeating the Jedi/Sith.
Overall a very satisfying game. We're in awe of how finely balanced the game is that keeps it exciting until the end.
I found a summary sheet on Board Game Geek that'll help us keep track of these things for the next game. I just noticed a rule we missed both times we've played, in that Anakin may continue to try to move after a starfighter card is cleared. Maybe that's why our games last so long!
Danger Planet open session. 3-player Roundominos, 4-player Super Deluxe Quintillions, 4-player Parts Unknown.
Roundominos.
Players were Karl, Paul and myself. Paul
and I were new players.
This was an interesting game using Kadon Games Roundomino's pieces. We played a game such that we choose and place a piece. For each circle that touches an existing circle, the player scores a point. Pieces of the same colors must not touch. A game lasted thirty minutes.
Roundominoes link:
Super Deluxe Quintillions.
Players were Karl, Paul,
Nancy and myself.
We played a full version of the game with all the pieces. However, I caused the unstable structure to collapse during the third part of the game. So we scored what had so far.
Super Deluxe Quintillions link:
Parts
Unknown.
Players were Karl, Paul, Nancy and myself.
Players are retail store owners who supply body parts to the local mad scientists. Viktor, a mad scientist, goes around window shopping. Whenever he stops to look at a particular type of parts, a demand for that type of part is created; all the parts at the cheapest price get sold. If there is still a demand, all the parts at the next cheapest price get sold. This continues until demand is met. If parts sold exceed demand, a surplus is created, which may put an extra townsfolk back into the population. If the demand is not met, a shortage is created which will be filled by removing a townsfolk.
Each turn, players get a part from their gravediggers, and can pay for more parts. Players can buy store shelves, and stock those shelves with parts, setting them to a specific, fixed price. If parts don't sell. the may be shuffled off to the "parts unknown" pile, which will automatically sell at cerain times at a highly discounted rate. There could be, at times, a monster on the loose which scares off shoppers, getting them to buy parts only at the cheapest price, ignoring other available parts. Also, villagers might riot, which causes parts from the gravediggers to be more expensive. Play with the most money at the end of the game wins.
This game turned out to be three hours long. That was unexpected from Cheapass Games which are usually short and quick. Besides that, the game was mostly a mix of randomness and strategy. One striking moment was when I bought up and stocked brains at a certain price, thinking brains will eventually sell and no one would be able to meet all the demand. As it turned out, Viktor created a demand for one brain, and Paul had the cheapest, completely undercutting my stock at the next cheapest price. Argh! Game ended at the end of the calendar loop. :-)
Click here to see how the mid-game board looked.
Private session. 2-player Magic: the Gathering.
Magic: the Gathering.
Players were Paul and myself.
We played nine games.
It's been a long time since we played this. We stopped playing around the time 5th Edition came out, so all those nice old cards came into play. I'll just mention the colorful names of our decks and thier scores along with any interesting events during the game.
Paul played Righteous Fire (red and white) against my Decaying Death (black.) During the first game, Paul was able to get his direct damage cards out fairly quickly, foiling anything I could try. The next two games, Paul had mana problems, and conceded when I sloly, but surely, kept coming out with painful attacks. I won the next game.
Then Paul tried his Armageddon (black and red) against my Decaying Death (black.) I got the first victory. We mutually annialated each other the next game. The Paul won. I had a problem playing a few cards that benefitted black cards (like Bad Moon) because he had cards that would benefit as well. I had to count on Pestillence to get some damage in.
Then Paul tried his Nightmares (green and black) against my Deck of Life (green and white.) Paul was getting his Thalids out, but I was able to overwhelm them before they could spawn.
Then Paul tired his Sea's Bounty (blue) against my Deck of Pain (white and red.) Even though I was damaging him slowly, he was able to get enough creatures out to damage me at a faster rate for the win.
Magic: the Gathering links:
Private game at English Muffin Restaurant. 2-player Uno.
Uno.
I have a special edition Uno with a Harry Potter
theme. I played two games with my dear friend's nine-year-old
daugter while waiting for food.
Uno is a game in which a player matches either the number or color of a card, in an effort to get rid of all his cards. There are additional cards, to reverse the turn order, skip a player, cause the opponent to draw cards and a wild card that can be played on any card and set a new color.
This edition has Harry Potter artwork, and "Draw 3" cards instead of "Draw 2" cards. It has two extra cards: Invisibility and Howler which seem to replace two of the "Wild Draw Four" cards. We didn't play with those because I didn't have the rules for them with me.
The rules were easy for her to grasp and she had enough fun playing it that she wanted her own deck.
Danger Planet open gaming. 3-player Tantrix, 7-player Citadels, 4-player Carcassonne, 4-player Entdecker.
Tantrix.
Players were Karl, Cindy and myself. I was the new player.
In this game, players have a hand of four hex tiles. Tiles have three lines connecting two sides of the tile in any of four colors. Each line on a tile is a different color.
Each player is one of four colors. Players lay down a tile for their free move, touching at least one side of an existing tile, matching the color of the lines. Players must fill all forced moves (an empty space that would have a tile border on three sides.) Players draw a tile after placing a tile. Players score when tiles run out: one point per tile for the longest line or two points per tile for the longest loop.
There's a bit of luck involved in that a player has to make the most of the tiles he drew. Otherwise, the strategy is straightforward in that one tries to make a long line of his color with the potential of creating a loop while either forcing the next player to help with this goal, and depriving the next player of good moves with forced moves.
Like many puzzle games, the real treat is to watch the emerging patterns as the game goes on. This game lasted about a half hour.
Click here to see how the mid-game looked.
Citadels.
Players were Jimmy, Rich, Jason, Eric, Cindy, Karl and
myself. Rich and Jason played before.
This is a game in which players pass around a set of cards to pick a role from the card. Roles have some kind of bonus outside the normal play. On a player's turn, he may draw two gold, or draw two cards and keep one. Then he may build, spending gold to lay down a card. The game ends when a player lays down eight cards, and the highest score, counting the values of cards built, wins.
It seemed like Jimmy, Cindy and I were threatening to finish the game with high scores toward the end. So it was a battle of persuasion. Karl and I ended up goofing around with our gold bits which threw off the game and helped our scores. The game ended after about an hour and a half. This game felt unique because even if we didn't goof around, I was ahead and people didn't gang up on me! :-)
Click here to see how the game end looked.
Carcassonne
with river expansion.
Players were Karl, Jimmy, Eric
and myself. We all played before.
This was one of those games where nearly all the towns were connected to common farms, and three of us tied for them.
